Difference between revisions of "Bose L1® Musicians Conference Fall 2006/Agenda"
(name change and category change) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | <big>'''Bose L1™ | + | <big>'''Bose L1™ Musicians Conference Fall 2006/Agenda'''</big> |
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
− | [[category:Bose L1™ | + | [[category:Bose L1™ Musicians Conference Fall 2006]] |
Revision as of 18:19, 22 August 2006
Bose L1™ Musicians Conference Fall 2006/Agenda
Agenda: Emerging
Chris Ickler: Understanding ToneMatch™ presets
(note: some text below taken from an email from ickler to jacob)
Narrators in the Taylor/Bose video are having some difficulty explaining the ToneMatch™ concept simply, so the video tries to solve that problem by providing multiple explanations and by conveying the enthusiasm of the people involved instead.
Chris Ickler has some ideas on how to talk about this at the Fall L1 Owners Conference and maybe that will lead to a shorter, more accurate message about ToneMatch technology.
(ickler text follows)
Nobody can ToneMatch a system that doesn’t have uniform coverage. (It’s like trying to impose a house curve on an installed system that has spotty coverage.) Certainly no triple system has uniform coverage. Even if you decided to ToneMatch every instrument through every speaker of a triple system, you would have to nail the performers’ shoes to the floor and the audience would have to take turns standing in the "ToneMatched" sweet spot of the FOH system. ToneMatch technology only has audible benefit AFTER you solve the coverage problem.
- So the first problem of amplified music is to get the same tone everywhere. The L1 is the solution.
- The second problem of amplified music is to get the right tone everywhere. ToneMatch is the solution.
- No one can deliver the second solution before they deliver the first solution.
OLDGHM?: Vocal Microphones
See this post as one of many from oldghm on the subject of vocal microphones.
We had this on the agenda for the Big Sur Conference but never got to it.