Difference between revisions of "Bwiki"
m |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
• Readers get to enjoy the overall interface which is pretty good, but contributors have to learn a somewhat non-intuitive interface. | • Readers get to enjoy the overall interface which is pretty good, but contributors have to learn a somewhat non-intuitive interface. | ||
| − | <br><br> | + | <br><br><br>[http://toonz.ca/bwiki/index.php?title=Main_Page http://toonz.ca/bwiki/]<br><br>Let<nowiki>’</nowiki>s refer to it as the bwiki site for now.<br><br> |
===Likes=== | ===Likes=== | ||
Revision as of 10:02, 7 August 2006
To b or not 2 b
I have installed and configured MediaWiki (same software as is used for Wikipedia). After a couple of days with it ...
• I really like the appearance, although the unmistakable resemblance to Wikipedia has both good and bad connotations.
• Setting it up was a bit of a chore. Different back end, scripting language and database than I prefer, but it’s all running now.
• The real deal breaker may be the editor (that everyone who contributes or edits has to use)
• Readers get to enjoy the overall interface which is pretty good, but contributors have to learn a somewhat non-intuitive interface.
http://toonz.ca/bwiki/
Let’s refer to it as the bwiki site for now.
Likes
• Looks good
• The interface is familiar to anyone who uses Wikipedia
Dislikes / Concerns
• Editor (used for creating and changing content) is not WYSIWYM (What you see is what you meant)
• I am less familiar with the underlying programming language (PHP) and Database (MySQL), than I am with the system you are looking at now (.NET and SQL Server).
Interesting
• Strong resemblance to Wikipedia may inspire (unknown) responses
• Challenging Editor interface may deter frivolous contributions
• Has a "talk" feature which is a discussion area for each article