Difference between revisions of "Bwiki"

From Bose Portable PA Encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m
Line 21: Line 21:
 
• Editor (used for creating and changing content) is not WYSIWYM (What you see is what you meant)
 
• Editor (used for creating and changing content) is not WYSIWYM (What you see is what you meant)
  
• I am less familiar with the underlying programming language (PHP) and Database (MySQL), than I am with the system you are looking at now (.NET and SQL Server).
+
• I am less familiar with the underlying programming language (PHP) and Database (MySQL), than with the other wiki (.NET and SQL Server).
  
 
===Interesting===
 
===Interesting===
Line 31: Line 31:
 
• Has a "talk" feature which is a discussion area for each article
 
• Has a "talk" feature which is a discussion area for each article
  
 +
• This system does not have integrated features like blogs, forums as well as wikis. We may not need those other features.
 
[[category:bwiki]]
 
[[category:bwiki]]

Revision as of 10:05, 7 August 2006

To b or not 2 b

I have installed and configured MediaWiki (same software as is used for Wikipedia). After a couple of days with it ...

• I really like the appearance, although the unmistakable resemblance to Wikipedia has both good and bad connotations.

• Setting it up was a bit of a chore. Different back end, scripting language and database than I prefer, but it’s all running now.

• The real deal breaker may be the editor (that everyone who contributes or edits has to use)

• Readers get to enjoy the overall interface which is pretty good, but contributors have to learn a somewhat non-intuitive interface.




http://toonz.ca/bwiki/

Let’s refer to it as the bwiki site for now.

Likes

• Looks good

• The interface is familiar to anyone who uses Wikipedia

Dislikes / Concerns

• Editor (used for creating and changing content) is not WYSIWYM (What you see is what you meant)

• I am less familiar with the underlying programming language (PHP) and Database (MySQL), than with the other wiki (.NET and SQL Server).

Interesting

• Strong resemblance to Wikipedia may inspire (unknown) responses

• Challenging Editor interface may deter frivolous contributions

• Has a "talk" feature which is a discussion area for each article

• This system does not have integrated features like blogs, forums as well as wikis. We may not need those other features.